<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extending Cam Slings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allclimbing.com/archive/2009/11/extending-cam-slings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allclimbing.com/archive/2009/11/extending-cam-slings/</link>
	<description>Blogging on climbing, bouldering, mountaineering, and training.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extending Cam Slings &#124; HollyWord.</title>
		<link>http://www.allclimbing.com/archive/2009/11/extending-cam-slings/comment-page-1/#comment-325492</link>
		<dc:creator>Extending Cam Slings &#124; HollyWord.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allclimbing.com/?p=1664#comment-325492</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: Extending Cam Slings    No Comments by admin on November 29, 2009  filed in Rock climbing tagged both-the-leader, cams, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: Extending Cam Slings    No Comments by admin on November 29, 2009  filed in Rock climbing tagged both-the-leader, cams, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://www.allclimbing.com/archive/2009/11/extending-cam-slings/comment-page-1/#comment-315671</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allclimbing.com/?p=1664#comment-315671</guid>
		<description>I agree that the sling-on-sling solution is rather cumbersome, especially for the second, but there are some placements where it is necessary. Deeper horizontal placements can sometimes lever the biner against an edge. Although its good to know that this weakens the strength of the sling. Sounds like its something to be avoided unless absolutely necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the sling-on-sling solution is rather cumbersome, especially for the second, but there are some placements where it is necessary. Deeper horizontal placements can sometimes lever the biner against an edge. Although its good to know that this weakens the strength of the sling. Sounds like its something to be avoided unless absolutely necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.570 seconds -->
